|
|
Lowry v. Allen, 203 U.S. 476 (1906)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Lowry v. Allen, 203 U.S. 476 (1906)
Lowry v. Allen No. 56 Argued October 24, 25, 1906 Decided December 10, 1906 203 U.S. 476
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Syllabus
Rule 124 of the Patent Office which provide that no appeal can be taken from a decision of a primary examiner affirming the patentability of the claim or the applicant’s right to make the same, is not void as contrary to the provisions of § 482, 483, 4904, 4910, 4911, Rev.Stats., or § 9 of the Act of February 9, 1893, 27 Stat. 436. Those statutes provide only for appeals upon the question of priority of invention, and appeals on other questions are left under the power given by § 483, Rev.Stat., to the regulation of the Patent Office.
26 App.D.C. 8 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Lowry v. Allen, 203 U.S. 476 (1906) in 203 U.S. 476 203 U.S. 478. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6KGVG6Q4E9CAS8T.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Lowry v. Allen, 203 U.S. 476 (1906), in 203 U.S. 476, page 203 U.S. 478. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6KGVG6Q4E9CAS8T.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Lowry v. Allen, 203 U.S. 476 (1906). cited in 1906, 203 U.S. 476, pp.203 U.S. 478. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6KGVG6Q4E9CAS8T.
|