Miller v. United States, 233 U.S. 1 (1914)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Miller v. United States, 233 U.S. 1 (1914)
Miller v. United States No. 178 Argued January 19, 20, 1914 Decided April 6, 1914 233 U.S. 1
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
The postal contract involved in this action conferred authority on the United States to discontinue its performance and gave the Post Office authorities power after the discontinuance to deal with the mail routes which the contract previously embraced in such manner as was found necessary to subserve the public interest.
The averments of the bill did not show such a state of facts as would justify the conclusion that the action of the Post Office authorities in exerting the lawful power of discontinuance was so impelled by bad faith as to cause the exertion of the otherwise lawful power to be invalid and void.
In determining rights thereunder, this Court must be governed by the contract, and cannot first destroy it in part and then enforce that which remains.
The difficulties in performing a postal contract are presumably in the minds of the contracting parties, and the government cannot be deprived of the protection of the reserved powers of cancellation in case of the failure of the contractor to perform by reason of such difficulties.
Where the hardships endured by a postal route contractor are the results of his own mistake in making an improvident contract, relief can only be obtained at the hands of Congress.
47 Ct.Cl. 146 affirmed.
The facts, which involve the authority of the Postmaster General to cancel postal contracts and the rights of a contractor for a mail route in Alaska in that respect, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Miller v. United States, 233 U.S. 1 (1914) in 233 U.S. 1 233 U.S. 2–233 U.S. 5. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6ID4LMBBA83SPSJ.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Miller v. United States, 233 U.S. 1 (1914), in 233 U.S. 1, pp. 233 U.S. 2–233 U.S. 5. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6ID4LMBBA83SPSJ.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Miller v. United States, 233 U.S. 1 (1914). cited in 1914, 233 U.S. 1, pp.233 U.S. 2–233 U.S. 5. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=6ID4LMBBA83SPSJ.
|