|
|
Martin v. Dist. Of Columbia Ct. Of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Martin v. Dist. Of Columbia Ct. Of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992)
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals Nos. 92-5584 , 92-5618 Decided Nov. 2, 1992 506 U.S. 1
ON MOTION OF PETITIONER FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Syllabus
Since this Court’s Rule 39.8 was invoked in November, 1991, to first deny pro se petitioner Martin in forma pauperis status, he has filed 11 petitions for certiorari, all but one of which have been demonstrably frivolous.
Held: Martin is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the instant cases, and the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions for certiorari from him in noncriminal matters unless he pays the required docketing fee and submits his petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33. Martin is a notorious abuser of the Court’s certiorari process, and consideration of his repetitious and frivolous petitions does not allow the Court to allocate its resources in a way that promotes the interests of justice.
Motions denied.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Martin v. Dist. Of Columbia Ct. Of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) in 506 U.S. 1 Original Sources, accessed August 2, 2025, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5PK4IKEFZV1CNYH.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Martin v. Dist. Of Columbia Ct. Of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992), in 506 U.S. 1, Original Sources. 2 Aug. 2025. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5PK4IKEFZV1CNYH.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Martin v. Dist. Of Columbia Ct. Of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992). cited in 1992, 506 U.S. 1. Original Sources, retrieved 2 August 2025, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5PK4IKEFZV1CNYH.
|