Moyer v. Peabody, 212 U.S. 78 (1909)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Moyer v. Peabody, 212 U.S. 78 (1909)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 212 U.S. 58, click here.
Moyer v. Peabody No. 55 Argued January 5, 6, 1909 Decided January 18, 1909 212 U.S. 78
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Syllabus
What is due process of law depends on circumstances, and varies with the subject matter and necessities of the situation.
An officer of a state interfering with an individual’s rights in an unconstitutional manner derives no protection from personal liability on account of his office.
The declaration of the governor of a state that a state of insurrection exists is conclusive.
Where the constitution and laws of a state give the governor power to suppress insurrection by the National Guard, as is the case in Colorado, he may also seize and imprison those resisting, and is the final judge of the necessity for such action, and when such an arrest is made in good faith, he cannot be subjected to an action therefor after he is out of office on the ground that he had not reasonable cause.
Public danger warrants the substitution of executive for judicial process, and the ordinary rights of individuals must yield to what the executive honestly deems the necessities of a critical moment.
Without deciding other questions as to the jurisdiction of the circuit court, held that the declaration of plaintiff in error in this case against the former governor of Colorado for arrest and detention during a period of insurrection does not give the circuit court jurisdiction thereof under § 629 or 1979, Rev.Stat., as a suit authorized by law brought to redress the deprivation of a constitutional right.
148 F. 870 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Moyer v. Peabody, 212 U.S. 78 (1909) in 212 U.S. 78 212 U.S. 79–212 U.S. 82. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5FSEBJ7VIYYBC3S.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Moyer v. Peabody, 212 U.S. 78 (1909), in 212 U.S. 78, pp. 212 U.S. 79–212 U.S. 82. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5FSEBJ7VIYYBC3S.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Moyer v. Peabody, 212 U.S. 78 (1909). cited in 1909, 212 U.S. 78, pp.212 U.S. 79–212 U.S. 82. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5FSEBJ7VIYYBC3S.
|