|
|
Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 (1979)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 (1979)
Perrin v. United States No. 78-959 Argued October 3, 1979 Decided November 27, 1979 444 U.S. 37
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Petitioner, with others, was indicted for violating and conspiring to violate the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952, which makes it a federal offense to travel or use a facility in interstate commerce to commit, inter alia, "bribery . . . in violation of the laws of the State in which committed." Petitioner and his codefendants were charged with using facilities of interstate commerce to promote a commercial bribery scheme in violation of the laws of Louisiana, i.e., a scheme to exploit geological exploration data stolen from a Louisiana-based company by an employee of the company who was promised a percentage of the profits realized from exploitation of the information. Petitioner was convicted, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, rejecting the contention that Congress intended "bribery" in the Travel Act to include only bribery of public officials.
Held: Bribery of private employees prohibited by state criminal statutes violates the Travel Act. Pp. 41-50.
(a) By 1961, when the Act was enacted as part of a legislative program directed against "organized crime," the common understanding of "bribery" had extended beyond its early common law definitions limiting it to bribery of public officials. In 42 States and in federal legislation, "bribery" included the bribery of individuals acting in a private capacity. Pp. 41-45.
(b) The generic definition of bribery, rather than a narrow common law definition limited to public officials, was intended by Congress. References in the legislative history to the purposes and scope of the Travel Act, as well as other bills included in the package of "organized crime" legislation aimed at supplementing state enforcement, indicate that Members, Committees, and draftsmen used "bribery" to include payments to private individuals to influence their actions. Congress recognized in 1961 that bribery of private persons was widely used in highly organized criminal efforts to infiltrate and gain control of legitimate businesses, an area of special concern of Congress in enacting the Travel Act. Cf. United States v. Nardello, 393 U.S. 286. Pp. 45-49.
(c) Federalism principles do not dictate a narrow interpretation of "bribery" here. So long as the requisite interstate nexus is present (sufficiency of the nexus no longer being at issue in this case), the statute reflects a clear and deliberate intent on Congress’ part to alter the federal-state balance in order to reinforce state law enforcement. Rewis v. United States, 401 U.S. 808, distinguished. Pp. 49-50.
580 F.2d 730, affirmed.
BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except WHITE, J., who took no part in the decision of the case.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 (1979) in 444 U.S. 37 444 U.S. 38. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5F1IM2S6SK3ETKP.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 (1979), in 444 U.S. 37, page 444 U.S. 38. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5F1IM2S6SK3ETKP.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 (1979). cited in 1979, 444 U.S. 37, pp.444 U.S. 38. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=5F1IM2S6SK3ETKP.
|