|
|
Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Barge Line, 385 U.S. 32 (1966)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Barge Line, 385 U.S. 32 (1966)
Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line No. 319 Decided November 7, 1966 385 U.S. 32
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
Court’s exercise of discretion held not warranted to overlook 22-day delay beyond time fixed by its Rule 13(1) for docketing of appeals where such delay was inadequately accounted for.
252 F.Supp. 162, appeal dismissed.
Contents:
Chicago:
U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Barge Line, 385 U.S. 32 (1966) in 385 U.S. 32 Original Sources, accessed July 30, 2025, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4ZK1MTRMIHS758V.
MLA:
U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Barge Line, 385 U.S. 32 (1966), in 385 U.S. 32, Original Sources. 30 Jul. 2025. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4ZK1MTRMIHS758V.
Harvard:
U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Barge Line, 385 U.S. 32 (1966). cited in 1966, 385 U.S. 32. Original Sources, retrieved 30 July 2025, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4ZK1MTRMIHS758V.
|