E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co., 246 U.S. 634 (1918)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co., 246 U.S. 634 (1918)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 246 U.S. 631, click here.
E. H. Emery & Company v. American Refrigerator Transit Company No. 739 Argued April 19, 1918 Decided April 29, 1918 246 U.S. 634
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
Syllabus
In respect of the removability to the district court of an action against a refrigerator car company for damages of less than $3,000.00 to goods in interstate transit,
Held:
(1) That an undertaking for proper care and service implied with the company’s contract to furnish cars to the shipper could not be a basis for liability under the Carmack Amendment.
(2) Upon the theory that the car company and the railroad were partners as to the shipments, the former would become a common carrier pro hac vice, and the amount involved would be insufficient. Act of July 20, 1914, amending Jud.Code, § 28.
(3) Liability of the car company under a contract assuming liability of the railroad (if the shipper could avail of it) would not make the case one arising under the Act to Regulate Commerce.
(4) A charge that the car company, by furnishing improper cars and service, failed in duty owed to the railroad and to the public, and so caused the damage, if it did not make out the company a common carrier, stated no duty under the act, but only one at common law.
Reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co., 246 U.S. 634 (1918) in 246 U.S. 634 246 U.S. 635. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4TTL8U1QEW5PZFC.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co., 246 U.S. 634 (1918), in 246 U.S. 634, page 246 U.S. 635. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4TTL8U1QEW5PZFC.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co., 246 U.S. 634 (1918). cited in 1918, 246 U.S. 634, pp.246 U.S. 635. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4TTL8U1QEW5PZFC.
|