|
|
Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., Inc., 281 U.S. 610 (1930)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., Inc., 281 U.S. 610 (1930)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 281 U.S. 599, click here.
Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., Inc. Nos. 445 , 510 and 511 Argued April 25, 1930 Decided May 26, 1930 281 U.S. 610
CERTIORARI TO AND CERTIFICATES FROM THE CIRCUIT COURTS
OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD CIRCUITS, RESPECTIVELY
Syllabus
1. A permit to manufacture denatured alcohol under the Prohibition Act (§ 4, Title II, § 10, Title III) is not a permit to manufacture "liquor," within the meaning of §§ 1 and 6, Title II, the latter of which provides that permits to manufacture "liquor" may be issued for only one year. P. 615.
2. A provision in a permit that it shall be in force until surrendered by the holder or cancelled by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for violation of the National Prohibition Act or regulations made pursuant thereto complies with the requirement of § B, Title II of the Act, that every permit "shall designate and limit the time when" the authorized acts may be performed. Id.
3. A permit to operate a denaturing plant, which permit provides that it shall be in force until surrendered by the holder or cancelled by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for violation of the National Prohibition Act or regulations made pursuant thereto, may not be terminated by a general regulation providing that all such permits shall expire on a date named. Id.
4. A permit to use specially denatured alcohol in the manufacture of toilet preparations, which provides that it shall be in effect until surrendered by the holder or cancelled by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for violation of the provisions of Title II of the National Prohibition Act or the regulations made pursuant thereto, may not be terminated by a general regulation providing that all such permits shall expire on a date named. P. 617.
34 F.2d 645 affirmed. Certified questions answered.
These cases are like those dealt with in the opinion on p. 599, ante. The first of them came here by certiorari to review a decree affirming an injunction. In the other two, decrees of the district court granting injunctions, 30 F.2d 400, were appealed to the circuit court of appeals, which sent up questions by certificate.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., Inc., 281 U.S. 610 (1930) in 281 U.S. 610 281 U.S. 611–281 U.S. 612. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4MXAK919L83TXJF.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., Inc., 281 U.S. 610 (1930), in 281 U.S. 610, pp. 281 U.S. 611–281 U.S. 612. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4MXAK919L83TXJF.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., Inc., 281 U.S. 610 (1930). cited in 1930, 281 U.S. 610, pp.281 U.S. 611–281 U.S. 612. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4MXAK919L83TXJF.
|