Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923)

Name: Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923) - Syllabus
Author: U.S. Supreme Court

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 261 U.S. 502, click here.

Russell Motor Car Company v. United States

Nos. 485

, 480

, 740

Argued March 6, 1923
Decided April 9, 1923
261 U.S. 514

APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS

Syllabus

1. The Act of June 15, 1917, c. 29, 40 Stat. 182, empowered the President, within the limits of amounts appropriated, "to modify, suspend, cancel, or requisition any existing or future contract for the building, production, or purchase of ships or material," and to exercise the authority "through such agency or agencies as he shall determine from time to time," "material" being defined as including stores, supplies, and equipment for ships and everything required for or in connection with the production thereof.

Held: (a) The word "material" included anti-aircraft gun mounts for the Navy. P. 518.

(b) The power "to modify, suspend, cancel, or requisition" any contract, etc., extends to the cancellation of the government’s own contracts. P. 519.

(c) An executive order delegating power under this clause in sweeping terms to the Secretary of the Navy should be construed broadly, and included the power to cancel government contracts. P. 523.

(d) An order of the Secretary cancelling a contract need not refer to the statute. Id.

(e) The just compensation to which a party is entitled upon cancellation of his contract under the statute does not include anticipated profits. Id.

2. The maxim noscitur a sociis is used only to solve ambiguity. Verbs in an enumeration whose meaning, when they are separately applied to their common object, is plain should be interpreted distributively. P. 519.

3. Where the meaning of a statute may be ascertained without extrinsic aid, debates in Congress will not be considered. P. 522.

57 Ct.Clms. 464, 244, and 626 affirmed.

Appeals from three judgments of the Court of Claims fixing just compensation for the cancellation of claimants’ contracts with the government. In the first and third cases, the contracts for the manufacture of anti-aircraft gun carriages and brass shell cases were entered into through the Navy Department, and were cancelled by the Secretary of the Navy by authority delegated under the Act of June 15, 1917. In the second case (No. 480), the contract was with the Emergency Fleet Corporation, for the construction of barges, and was cancelled through that agency under like authority.

Contents:

Related Resources

None available for this document.

Download Options

Title: Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923)

Select an option:

*Note: A download may not start for up to 60 seconds.

Email Options

Title: Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923)

Select an option:

Email addres:

*Note: It may take up to 60 seconds for for the email to be generated.

Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923) in 261 U.S. 514 261 U.S. 515–261 U.S. 516. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4JAJKBW5Q9A94D3.

MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923), in 261 U.S. 514, pp. 261 U.S. 515–261 U.S. 516. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4JAJKBW5Q9A94D3.

Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923). cited in 1923, 261 U.S. 514, pp.261 U.S. 515–261 U.S. 516. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4JAJKBW5Q9A94D3.