|
|
Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, 219 U.S. 114 (1911)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, 219 U.S. 114 (1911)
Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, Nebraska No. 445 Argued December 8, 1910 Decided January 3, 1911 219 U.S. 114
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Syllabus
Following, and on the authority of, Noble State Bank v. Haskell, ante, p. 104, sustaining the Bank Depositors’ Guaranty Fund Acts of Oklahoma, held that a similar act of Nebraska providing for a guaranty fund and prohibiting banking except by corporations formed under the act, is not unconstitutional.
172 F. 999 reversed.
The facts, which involve the constitutionality of the banking act of Nebraska, creating a depositors’ guaranty fund, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, 219 U.S. 114 (1911) in 219 U.S. 114 219 U.S. 120. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4G9D3M2RFD9L3UW.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, 219 U.S. 114 (1911), in 219 U.S. 114, page 219 U.S. 120. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4G9D3M2RFD9L3UW.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, 219 U.S. 114 (1911). cited in 1911, 219 U.S. 114, pp.219 U.S. 120. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=4G9D3M2RFD9L3UW.
|