|
|
Lancaster v. Kathleen Oil Co., 241 U.S. 551 (1916)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Lancaster v. Kathleen Oil Co., 241 U.S. 551 (1916)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 241 U.S. 544, click here.
Lancaster v. Kathleen Oil Company No. 336 Submitted April 26, 1916 Decided June 12, 1916 241 U.S. 551
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Syllabus
As one not in possession may not maintain an action to quiet title, and as, in Oklahoma, one may not maintain a suit in ejectment as lessee under an oil or gas mining lease, an adequate remedy at law does not exist in this case, and therefore equity has jurisdiction of a suit brought by the holder of an oil and gas lease on lands in Oklahoma to restrain those claiming under another lease from interfering with the property.
If such leases cover Indian allottee land and have been approved by the Secretary of the Interior, the case arises under the laws of the United States, and a federal court has jurisdiction.
A suit by one lessee against another, the prayer of the complaint in which is not only recovery of possession of the property, but also an injunction restraining defendant from asserting rights under his lease, cannot be regarded as a mere suit for ejectment, and if the bill clearly shows that both plaintiff and defendant claim under leases of Indian lands, the validity of which depends upon the construction of Acts of Congress and the effect of approval given by the Secretary of the Interior, the case is one arising under the laws of the United States of which the district court has jurisdiction.
In such a case, the statements of the bill can determine the jurisdiction of the district court, as they are not mere anticipatory statements of a possible defense to be set up by defendant.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the district court of a suit involving the validity of gas and oil leases on lands of allottee Indians, are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Lancaster v. Kathleen Oil Co., 241 U.S. 551 (1916) in 241 U.S. 551 241 U.S. 552. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3Y9UDLBYXL6T7PA.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Lancaster v. Kathleen Oil Co., 241 U.S. 551 (1916), in 241 U.S. 551, page 241 U.S. 552. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3Y9UDLBYXL6T7PA.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Lancaster v. Kathleen Oil Co., 241 U.S. 551 (1916). cited in 1916, 241 U.S. 551, pp.241 U.S. 552. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3Y9UDLBYXL6T7PA.
|