|
|
Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972)
Kleindienst v. Mandel No. 71-16 Argued April 18, 1972 Decided June 29, 1972 408 U.S. 753
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
This action was brought to compel the Attorney General to grant a temporary nonimmigrant visa to a Belgian journalist and Marxian theoretician whom the American plaintiff appellees had invited to participate in academic conferences and discussions in this country. The alien had been found ineligible for admission under §§ 212(a)(28)(D) and (G)(v) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, barring those who advocate or publish "the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism." The Attorney General had declined to waive ineligibility as he has the power to do under § 212(d) of the Act, basing his decision on unscheduled activities engaged in by the alien on a previous visit to the United States, when a waiver was granted. A three-judge District Court, although holding that the alien had no personal entry right, concluded that citizens of this country had a First Amendment right to have him enter and to hear him, and enjoined enforcement of § 212 as to this alien.
Held: In the exercise of Congress’ plenary power to exclude aliens or prescribe the conditions for their entry into this country, Congress in § 212(a)(28) of the Act has delegated conditional exercise of this power to the Executive Branch. When, as in this case, the Attorney General decides for a legitimate and bona fide reason not to waive the statutory exclusion of an alien, courts will not look behind his decision or weigh it against the First Amendment interests of those who would personally communicate with the alien. Pp. 761-770.
325 F.Supp. 620, reversed.
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART, WHITE, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 770. MARSHALL, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN, J., joined, post, p.774.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972) in 408 U.S. 753 408 U.S. 754. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3WTNEDUS385RMJ5.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972), in 408 U.S. 753, page 408 U.S. 754. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3WTNEDUS385RMJ5.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972). cited in 1972, 408 U.S. 753, pp.408 U.S. 754. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3WTNEDUS385RMJ5.
|