|
Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, 407 U.S. 163 (1972)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, 407 U.S. 163 (1972)
Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis No. 70-75 Argued February 28, 1972 Decided June 12, 1972 407 U.S. 163
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Syllabus
Appellee Irvis, a Negro guest of a member of appellant, a private club, was refused service at the club’s dining room and bar solely because of his race. In suing for injunctive relief, appellee contended that the discrimination was state action, and thus a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because the Pennsylvania liquor board had issued appellant a private club liquor license. The District Court found appellant’s membership and guest practices discriminatory, agreed with appellee’s view that state action was present, and declared the liquor license invalid as long as appellant continued its discriminatory practices. Appellant’s motion to have the final decree limited to its guest policy was opposed by appellee, and the court denied the motion. Following the District Court’s decision, the applicable bylaws were amended to exclude as guests those who would be excluded as members.
Held:
1. Appellee, who had not applied for or been denied membership in appellant private club, had no standing to contest appellant’s membership practices. He did, however, have standing to litigate the constitutional validity of appellant’s discriminatory policies toward members’ guests, and his opposition to amendment of the judgment did not constitute a disclaimer of injunctive relief directed at appellant’s guest policies. Pp. 165-171.
2. The operation of Pennsylvania’s regulatory scheme enforced by the state liquor board, except as noted below, does not sufficiently implicate the State in appellant’s discriminatory guest practices so as to make those practices "state action" within the purview of the Equal Protection Clause, and there is no suggestion in the record that the State’s regulation of the sale of liquor is intended overtly or covertly to encourage discrimination. Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715, distinguished. Pp. 171-177.
3. Pennsylvania liquor board’s regulation requiring that "every club licensee shall adhere to all the provisions of its constitution and bylaws" in effect placed state sanctions behind the discriminatory guest practices that were enacted after the District Court’s decision, and enforcement of that regulation should be enjoined to the extent that it requires appellant to adhere to those practices. Pp. 177-179.
318 . Supp. 1246, reversed and remanded.
REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART, WHITE, BLACKMUN, and POWELL, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined, post, p. 179. BRENNAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined post, p. 184.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, 407 U.S. 163 (1972) in 407 U.S. 163 407 U.S. 164. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3SU16VZ4JEZU8TI.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, 407 U.S. 163 (1972), in 407 U.S. 163, page 407 U.S. 164. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3SU16VZ4JEZU8TI.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, 407 U.S. 163 (1972). cited in 1972, 407 U.S. 163, pp.407 U.S. 164. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3SU16VZ4JEZU8TI.
|