|
|
Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560 (1958)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560 (1958)
Payne v. Arkansas No. 99 Argued March 3, 1958 Decided May 19, 1958 356 U.S. 560
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Syllabus
Petitioner, a mentally dull 19-year-old Negro with a fifth-grade education, was convicted in a state court of first degree murder and sentenced to death. At his trial, there was admitted in evidence, over his objection, a confession shown by undisputed evidence to have been obtained in the following circumstances: he was arrested without a warrant, and never taken before a magistrate or advised of his right to remain silent or to have counsel, as required by state law. After being held incommunicado for three days without counsel, advisor, or friend, and with very little food, he confessed after being told by the Chief of Police that "there would be 30 or 40 people there in a few minutes that wanted to get him," and that, if he would tell the truth, the Chief of Police probably would keep them from coming in.
Held: Petitioner was denied due process of law contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment; the judgment of the State Supreme Court affirming the conviction is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Pp. 561-569.
(a) It is obvious from the totality of the course of conduct shown by undisputed evidence that the confession was coerced, and did not constitute an "expression of free choice." Pp. 562-567.
(b) Even though there may have been sufficient evidence, apart from the coerced confession, to support a conviction, the admission in evidence of the coerced confession over petitioner’s objection vitiates the judgment because it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 567-568.
(c) Stein v. New York, 346 U.S. 156, distinguished. P. 568.
226 Ark. 910, 225 S.W.2d 312, reversed, and cause remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560 (1958) in 356 U.S. 560 356 U.S. 561. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3HZHYSN5SLSUY7D.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560 (1958), in 356 U.S. 560, page 356 U.S. 561. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3HZHYSN5SLSUY7D.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560 (1958). cited in 1958, 356 U.S. 560, pp.356 U.S. 561. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=3HZHYSN5SLSUY7D.
|