|
Michigan Central R. Co. v. Mark Owen & Co., 256 U.S. 427 (1921)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Michigan Central R. Co. v. Mark Owen & Co., 256 U.S. 427 (1921)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 256 U.S. 421, click here.
Michigan Central Railroad Company v. Mark Owen & Company No. 299 Argued April 28, 1921 Decided June 1, 1921 256 U.S. 427
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Syllabus
1. Under a "uniform" interstate bill of lading providing that property not removed by the party entitled to receive it within 48 hours after the notice of its arrival may be kept in car, depot, or place of delivery of the carrier, subject to a reasonable charge for storage and to the carrier’s responsibility as warehouseman only, or may, at the carrier’s option, be stored in a public or licensed warehouse at the owner’s cost and risk, subject to a lien for the carrier’s freight and other charge, the carrier remains liable qua carrier during the 48-hour period, pending delivery. P. 430.
2. A carload of goods, upon arrival at destination, was placed upon the railroad’s public delivery track, and the consignee, having been notified, accepted the car, broke the seals thereon, and proceeded to unload. Held that this did not constitute a delivery of the goods, and that a loss of part, occurring during the unloading and within the 48-hour period provided in the bill of lading, ut supra, par. 1, must be borne by the railroad. P. 431.
291 Ill. 149 affirmed.
Certiorari to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of Illinois affirming a judgment for damages, rendered in favor of the present respondent by the appellate court of that state upon an appeal from a contrary judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago. The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Michigan Central R. Co. v. Mark Owen & Co., 256 U.S. 427 (1921) in 256 U.S. 427 256 U.S. 428. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2U4FCLBC4Y4L5LD.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Michigan Central R. Co. v. Mark Owen & Co., 256 U.S. 427 (1921), in 256 U.S. 427, page 256 U.S. 428. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2U4FCLBC4Y4L5LD.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Michigan Central R. Co. v. Mark Owen & Co., 256 U.S. 427 (1921). cited in 1921, 256 U.S. 427, pp.256 U.S. 428. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2U4FCLBC4Y4L5LD.
|