|
|
Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 373 U.S. 206 (1963)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 373 U.S. 206 (1963)
Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp. No. 229 Argued March 21, 1963 Decided May 13, 1963 373 U.S. 206
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Syllabus
While unloading a ship docked at a Puerto Rican port, a longshoreman suffered personal injuries when he slipped on some loose beans spilled on the dock from broken and defective bags being unloaded from the ship. He filed a libel in admiralty against the ship, claiming damages for injuries caused by the ship’s unseaworthiness and by the negligence of its owner.
Held:
1. The case was within the maritime jurisdiction under the Extension of Admiralty Jurisdiction Act, since it was alleged that the shipowner committed a tort while or before the ship was being unloaded and the impact was felt ashore at a time and place not remote from the wrongful act. Pp. 209-210.
2. This Court sustains the finding of the Trial Court that the shipowner was negligent in allowing the beans to be unloaded in their defective bagging when it knew or should have known that injury was likely to result to persons having to work about the beans that might, and did, spill, and that the shipowner was liable to the longshoreman for injuries resulting from such negligence, irrespective of its alleged lack of control of the impact zone. Pp. 210-212.
3. When a shipowner accepts cargo in a faulty container or allows a container to become faulty, he assumes responsibility for injuries that this may cause to seamen or their substitutes on or about the ship; these leaky bean bags were unfit, and thus unseaworthy. Pp. 212-214.
4. The duty to provide a seaworthy ship and gear, including cargo containers, applies to longshoremen unloading the ship, whether they are standing aboard ship or on the pier. Pp. 214-215.
5. Although the longshoreman filed his libel over a year after expiration of the analogous Puerto Rican statute of limitations, the finding of the Trial Court that no prejudice to the shipowner was occasioned by the delay and that the longshoreman’s claim therefore was not barred by laches is sustained as not plainly erroneous. Pp. 215-216.
301 F.2d 415 reversed, and cause remanded.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 373 U.S. 206 (1963) in 373 U.S. 206 373 U.S. 207. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2S5539S5BEGU8TG.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 373 U.S. 206 (1963), in 373 U.S. 206, page 373 U.S. 207. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2S5539S5BEGU8TG.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 373 U.S. 206 (1963). cited in 1963, 373 U.S. 206, pp.373 U.S. 207. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2S5539S5BEGU8TG.
|