|
|
Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 (1975)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 (1975)
Schlesinger v. Ballard No. 73-776 Argued October 15, 1974 Decided January 15, 1975 419 U.S. 498
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
Appellee, a naval officer with more than nine years of active service, who failed for a second time to be selected for promotion and thus under 10 U.S.C. § 6382(a) was subject to mandatory discharge, brought this action claiming that application of that statute to him, when compared to 10 U.S.C. § 6401 (under which, had he been a woman officer, he would have been entitled to 13 years of commissioned service before a mandatory discharge for want of promotion), was an unconstitutional discrimination based on sex in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. A three-judge District Court, relying on Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, concluded that the challenged mandatory discharge provisions are supported solely by considerations of fiscal and administrative policy, and upheld appellee’s claim.
Held: The challenged legislative classification is completely rational, and does not violate the Due Process Clause. Pp. 505-510.
(a) The different treatment of men and women naval officers under §§ 6382 and 6401 results not from mere administrative or fiscal convenience, but from the fact that female line officers, because of restrictions on their participating in combat and most sea duty, do not have opportunities for professional service equal to those of male line officers, and Congress could rationally conclude that a longer period of tenure for women officers comported with the goal of providing women officers with "fair and equitable career advancement programs." Frontiero v. Richardson, supra;Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, distinguished. Pp. 505-508.
(b) In naval corps where male and female officers are similarly situated Congress, made no tenure distinctions, thus underscoring the rationality of the legislative classification. P. 509.
(c) The challenged statutes further a flow of promotions commensurate with the Navy’s current needs, and serve to motivate qualified commissioned officers so to conduct themselves that they may realistically anticipate higher command levels. P. 510.
360 F.Supp. 643, reversed.
STEWART, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BLACKMUN, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. BRENNAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which DOUGLAS and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 511. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting statement, post, p. 521.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 (1975) in 419 U.S. 498 419 U.S. 499. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2K758N6FQ7CNPFA.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 (1975), in 419 U.S. 498, page 419 U.S. 499. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2K758N6FQ7CNPFA.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 (1975). cited in 1975, 419 U.S. 498, pp.419 U.S. 499. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2K758N6FQ7CNPFA.
|