|
|
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Texas, 245 U.S. 484 (1918)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Texas, 245 U.S. 484 (1918)
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company v. Texas No. 113 Submitted January 2, 1918 Decided January 14, 1918 245 U.S. 484
ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, THIRD SUPREME
JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
Syllabus
Where, in regular course, a passenger train is moved by one company from one state to a point in another and is there taken charge of and carried to destination by a second company, local to the second state, it is manifestly erroneous to hold that its interstate character is lost because the second company employs new crews and engines and cannot go beyond the state line.
An order of the Texas Railroad Commission requiring passenger trains in the state to leave stations on advertised schedule time, and allowing them no more than 30 minutes at origin or points of junction to make connection with trains of other lines, or 10 minute more if at the end of the 30 minutes the connecting trains are in sight, is an unjustifiable interference with interstate commerce as applied to a local railroad company in respect of an interstate train which, under contract, the company receives at a point within the state line from a connecting company, and forwards (in sections) to its destinations within the state. The infliction of penalties upon the local corporation, under the local law, for failure to comply with the order is beyond the power of the state courts in such a case. So held where, though the trial court found otherwise, the decisions of the intermediate and supreme courts of the state assumed that there was sufficient accommodation for local traffic independent of the through train in question -- an assumption which this Court adopts, and where the train was received too late to comply.
The suggestion that the order could have been complied with by running an extra train locally, if the interstate train was not on time, is impractical, and also inadequate in form, since, having exercised its right to advertise the latter train, the company could not escape liability for delay of that train by operating another.
The powers of a state over the local business of a local railroad company do not authorize the imposition of serious, unwarranted and unjust burdens in respect of its interstate trains.
167 S.W. 822 reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Texas, 245 U.S. 484 (1918) in 245 U.S. 484 245 U.S. 485–245 U.S. 487. Original Sources, accessed November 24, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2IT4BIQ59I6ZCQ9.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Texas, 245 U.S. 484 (1918), in 245 U.S. 484, pp. 245 U.S. 485–245 U.S. 487. Original Sources. 24 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2IT4BIQ59I6ZCQ9.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Texas, 245 U.S. 484 (1918). cited in 1918, 245 U.S. 484, pp.245 U.S. 485–245 U.S. 487. Original Sources, retrieved 24 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=2IT4BIQ59I6ZCQ9.
|