Hill v. Smith, 260 U.S. 592 (1923)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 260 U.S. 584, click here.

Hill v. Smith


No. 164


Argued January 3, 1923
Decided January 15, 1923
260 U.S. 592

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT
OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS

Syllabus

1. A federal question which was treated as open, and decided, by the state supreme court, will be reviewed here without inquiring whether its federal character was adequately called to the attention of the state trial court. P. 594.

2. A question of burden of proof may amount to a federal question when intimately involving substantive rights under a federal statute. P. 594.

3. The burden of proof is one thing, and the necessity of producing evidence to meet that already produced another. P. 594.

4. A creditor who would avoid the effect of a discharge under the Bankruptcy Act upon the ground that the debt was not scheduled, with his name, must prove himself within that exception, and the debtor who would excuse the omission of the creditor’s name upon the ground that the creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the bankruptcy proceedings must prove himself within that exception to the exception. P. 594.

232 Mass. 188 affirmed.

Certiorari to a judgment of the Superior Court of Massachusetts, entered on a finding for the plaintiff made subject to exceptions, which were overruled by the Supreme Judicial Court, in an action on a judgment.