|
|
Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65 (1904)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65 (1904)
Schick v. United States Nos. 222-223 Argued December 2, 1903 Decided May 31, 1904 195 U.S. 65
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Syllabus
A written waiver of a jury by a defendant in an action brought by the United States to recover a penalty of fifty dollars under § 11 of the act of 1886 as amended by the Act of May 9, 1902, is not in conflict with the laws and Constitution of the United States, and does not invalidate the judgment.
McCray v. United States, ante, p. 27, followed as to constitutionality of the oleomargarine legislation.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65 (1904) in 195 U.S. 65 195 U.S. 66. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=27UZCDXDCVXPFG6.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65 (1904), in 195 U.S. 65, page 195 U.S. 66. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=27UZCDXDCVXPFG6.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65 (1904). cited in 1904, 195 U.S. 65, pp.195 U.S. 66. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=27UZCDXDCVXPFG6.
|