United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 (1927)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 (1927)
United States v. Lee No. 752 Argued March 8, 1927 Decided May 31, 1927 274 U.S. 559
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Syllabus
1. Officers of the Coast Guard are authorized, by virtue of Rev.Stats. § 3072, to seize on the high seas beyond the twelve-mile limit an American vessel subject to forfeiture for violation of any law respecting the revenue. Maul v. United States, ante, p. 501. P. 562.
2. From that power it is fairly to be inferred that they are likewise authorized to board and search such vessels when there is probable cause to believe them subject to seizure for violation of revenue law, and to arrest persons thereon engaged in such violation. P. 562.
3. Where a boat was properly seized by a Coast Guard officer beyond the twelve-mile limit and brought in, a search of her by a deputy surveyor of the port, within the territory of the United States, was authorized by § 581 of the Tariff Act of 1922, and failure of the government to institute proceedings to forfeit the boat and cargo of illicit liquor did not, by retroaction, render illegal either the seizure or the search. P. 563.
4. A search of a boat made as an incident of a lawful arrest does not violate the Constitution. P. 563.
5. An examination of a boat with a searchlight before boarding her is not an unconstitutional search, and discovery thereby of illicit liquor is admissible in evidence. P. 563.
6. Legal evidence is not rendered inadmissible by a later trespass upon the part of the officers who obtained it. P. 563.
14 F.2d 400 reversed.
Certiorari (273 U.S. 686) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals reversing a conviction for conspiracy to violate the Tariff and Prohibition Acts upon the ground that evidence admitted was obtained by an illegal search and seizure.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 (1927) in 274 U.S. 559 274 U.S. 560. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1X9I4XIVBDQ732H.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 (1927), in 274 U.S. 559, page 274 U.S. 560. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1X9I4XIVBDQ732H.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 (1927). cited in 1927, 274 U.S. 559, pp.274 U.S. 560. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1X9I4XIVBDQ732H.
|