|
Brooks v. Dewar, 313 U.S. 354 (1941)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Brooks v. Dewar, 313 U.S. 354 (1941)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 313 U.S. 342, click here.
Brooks v. Dewar No. 718 Argued May 1, 1941 Decided May 26, 1941 313 U.S. 354
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
Syllabus
1. The judgment being erroneous on the merits, the Court abstains from inquiring whether this suit to enjoin a subordinate federal officer from alleged invasion of plaintiff’s rights under color of a federal statute but without authority, is a suit against the United States, or whether the Secretary of the Interior should have been joined as a necessary party defendant, or whether the state court was without power to enjoin a federal officer. P. 359.
2. In administering the Taylor Grazing Act of June 28, 1934, the Secretary of the Interior, relying on the broad powers conferred by § 2, issued temporary licenses to stockowners for the grazing of their livestock upon the public lands within grazing districts, and charged a uniform price per head, rather than have the grazing lands go unregulated pending the lengthy period required for instituting the plan, contemplated by § 3, of renewable term permits at reasonable fees adjusted to each case, etc. With full knowledge of this, Congress repeatedly appropriated part of the money thus brought into the Treasury for expenditure by the Secretary in improvement of the ranges.
Held, that the Secretary’s construction of the statute was thereby confirmed, and his action as agent of Congress in the administration of the Act was thereby ratified. P. 360.
60 Nev. 219; 106 P.2d 755, reversed.
Certiorari, 312 U.S. 674, to review the affirmance of a decree of injunction, entered upon the overruling of a demurrer to the bill.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Brooks v. Dewar, 313 U.S. 354 (1941) in 313 U.S. 354 313 U.S. 355. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1X8NCW6RLYZMN2F.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Brooks v. Dewar, 313 U.S. 354 (1941), in 313 U.S. 354, page 313 U.S. 355. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1X8NCW6RLYZMN2F.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Brooks v. Dewar, 313 U.S. 354 (1941). cited in 1941, 313 U.S. 354, pp.313 U.S. 355. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1X8NCW6RLYZMN2F.
|