Miller & Lux v. Sacramento Drainage District, 256 U.S. 129 (1921)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 256 U.S. 126, click here.

Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District

No. 317

Argued March 9, 10, 1921
Decided April 11, 1921
256 U.S. 129

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Syllabus

That particular land included in a drainage district will receive no direct benefit is clearly not per se enough to exempt them, under the Fourteenth Amendment, from assessment. P. 130. Houck v. Little River Drainage District, 239 U.S. 254.

Writ of error to review 182 Cal. 252 dismissed; petition for a writ of certiorari denied.

The case is stated in the opinion.