Ripley v. United States, 222 U.S. 144 (1911)

Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 222 U.S. 139, click here.

Ripley v. United States


No. 498, 499


Submitted May 29, 1911
Decided December 4, 1911
222 U.S. 144

APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS ON RETURN TO
MANDATE DIRECTING ADDITIONAL FINDINGS

Syllabus

Where the right of one claiming under a contract with the United States depends on whether the government inspector acted in good or in bad faith in refusing to allow the work to proceed, the findings of the Court of Claims should be specific in this respect, and, if not, the case will be remanded with directions to make specific findings. Findings, which simply state that the inspector in immediate charge of the work acted with knowledge, other inspectors being also referred to in the findings, and which do not make a direct and unequivocal finding as to the good or bad faith of the inspector in giving the order, do not conform to the order of this Court heretofore made in this case, 220 U.S. 491, and the case is remanded for further compliance therewith.

The facts, which involve the sufficiency of findings of the Court of Claims, are stated in the opinion.