|
Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Dashiell, 198 U.S. 521 (1905)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Dashiell, 198 U.S. 521 (1905)
Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Dashiell No. 212 Argued April 11, 1905 Decided May 29, 1905 198 U.S. 521
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
An employee of a railroad company executed a release which, after reciting that he had been injured in an accident, and that it was desirable to maintain pleasant relations, and avoid all controversy in the matter, and specifying certain slight bodily injuries including a scalp wound, released the company for a consideration of thirty dollars from all "claims and demands of every kind whatsoever for or on account of the injuries sustained in the manner and on the occasion aforesaid;" subsequently, after having remained in the company’s employ about three months, he sued and obtained a verdict for permanent bodily and mental injuries, resulting from injuries not enumerated in the release, including a fracture of the skull; there was testimony going to show that the fracture was not known when the release was executed and that the permanent disability resulted from nonenumerated injuries. The trial court charged that the release related only to damages sustained by the enumerated injuries and not to those sustained from the nonenumerated injuries. Held, not error, and that
General words in a release are to be limited and restrained to the particular words in the recital, and the release in this case, not being for all injuries, but only for the particular ones specified, was not a bar to a recovery for damages resulting from the nonenumerated injuries, and that the application of this rule is not affected by the words "avoid all controversy in regard to the matter," as those words did not relate to the accident, but to the specified injuries.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Dashiell, 198 U.S. 521 (1905) in 198 U.S. 521 198 U.S. 523. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1JBZQIKZLLJLPSA.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Dashiell, 198 U.S. 521 (1905), in 198 U.S. 521, page 198 U.S. 523. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1JBZQIKZLLJLPSA.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Dashiell, 198 U.S. 521 (1905). cited in 1905, 198 U.S. 521, pp.198 U.S. 523. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1JBZQIKZLLJLPSA.
|