|
United States v. Dickey, 268 U.S. 378 (1925)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Dickey, 268 U.S. 378 (1925)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 268 U.S. 373, click here.
United States v. Dickey No. 768 Argued April 16, 17, 1925 Decided May 25, 1925 268 U.S. 378
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
1. Assuming that no constitutional right of the taxpayer is invaded, the question whether income tax returns shall be published or kept secrets addressed to the discretion of Congress. P. 386.
2. Section 257(b) of the Revenue Act of June 2, 1924, directs the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to prepare, each year, and make
available to public inspection in such manner as he may determine, in the office of the collector of each internal revenue district and in such other places as he may determine, lists containing the name and post office address of each person making an income tax return in such district, together with the amount of the income tax paid by such person.
The same Act (§ 1018) reenacts § 3167 Rev.Stats., which makes it a misdemeanor to print or publish in any manner whatever "not provided by law" any income return or any part thereof, etc. Held, in view of the legislative history of these provisions and the evident policy of the Act to secure publicity of the information authorized to be put into the lists, that publication by newspapers. of the names and amounts of taxes so listed is not within the inhibition of § 3167. P. 385.
3 F.2d 190 affirmed.
Error to a judgment of the district court sustaining a demurrer to an indictment accusing the editor and the managing editor of divers newspapers of printing and publishing parts of federal income tax returns, in violation of § 1018 of the Revenue Act of June 2, 1924, reenacting Rev.Stats. § 3167.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Dickey, 268 U.S. 378 (1925) in 268 U.S. 378 268 U.S. 384. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1BRGE6WFUV8SKHI.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Dickey, 268 U.S. 378 (1925), in 268 U.S. 378, page 268 U.S. 384. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1BRGE6WFUV8SKHI.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Dickey, 268 U.S. 378 (1925). cited in 1925, 268 U.S. 378, pp.268 U.S. 384. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1BRGE6WFUV8SKHI.
|