|
United States v. Cook, 257 U.S. 523 (1922)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
United States v. Cook, 257 U.S. 523 (1922)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 257 U.S. 516, click here.
United States v. Cook No. 80 Argued January 13, 1922 Decided February 2, 1922 257 U.S. 523
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
Claimants contracted with the government to plan and supervise the construction of a public building for a fee, to be paid on monthly estimates and final completion, of 5 percent of the actual cost of the work executed from their drawing and specifications and under their supervision, as shown upon the books of the Supervising Architect by the net amount of construction contracts awarded and proposals accepted for additions or deductions. The building was delayed by an earthquake and fire, and Congress made an additional appropriation to be paid the building contractor upon its completion to recoup him for actually resulting losses due to increased prices of labor and materials, denying him any profit under his contract, and this extra payment was shown on the book of the Supervising Architect, but no appropriation was made for the claimants, although they had suffered likewise, and had applied to Congress unsuccessfully.
Held:
(1) The allowance to the building contractor was not a gratuity, but an alteration of his contract based on a moral consideration. P. 526.
(2) Claimants were entitled to their percentage on the additional amount so paid, since their equity was equally as strong and the words of their contract permitted. P. 528.
55 Ct.Clms. 215 affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims upholding a claim of architects for fees under a contract with the United States.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," United States v. Cook, 257 U.S. 523 (1922) in 257 U.S. 523 257 U.S. 524. Original Sources, accessed November 25, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1747IJ9GJGII15C.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." United States v. Cook, 257 U.S. 523 (1922), in 257 U.S. 523, page 257 U.S. 524. Original Sources. 25 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1747IJ9GJGII15C.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in United States v. Cook, 257 U.S. 523 (1922). cited in 1922, 257 U.S. 523, pp.257 U.S. 524. Original Sources, retrieved 25 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=1747IJ9GJGII15C.
|