Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Central Stock Yards Co., 212 U.S. 132 (1909)
Contents:
Show Summary
Hide Summary
General SummaryThis case is from a collection containing the full text of over 16,000 Supreme Court cases from 1793 to the present. The body of Supreme Court decisions are, effectively, the final interpretation of the Constitution. Only an amendment to the Constitution can permanently overturn an interpretation and this has happened only four times in American history.
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Central Stock Yards Co., 212 U.S. 132 (1909)
Please note: this case begins in mid-page. It therefore shares a citation with the last page of the previous case. If you are attempting to follow a link to the last page of 212 U.S. 118, click here.
Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Central Stock Yards Company No. 51 Argued December 10, 11, 1908 Decided January 25, 1909 212 U.S. 132
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
A provision in the constitution of a state that a carrier must deliver its cars to connecting carrier without providing adequate protection for their return, or compensation for their use, amounts to a taking of property without due process of law within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, and so held as to § 213, 214 of the Constitution of Kentucky.
The law must save the rights of parties, and not leave them to the discretion of the courts as such.
Where a general provision in the constitution of a state is void as taking property without due process or compensation, and compensation has not been provided by statute, the defect cannot be cured by the courts’ inserting provisions for compensation in judgments under such constitutional provision.
The duty of a carrier to accept goods tendered at its station does not require it to accept cars offered by competing roads at arbitrary points near its terminus for the purpose of using its terminal station. A law requiring the carrier so to do is unconstitutional as taking property without due process of law.
7 S.W. 778 reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Contents:
Chicago: U.S. Supreme Court, "Syllabus," Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Central Stock Yards Co., 212 U.S. 132 (1909) in 212 U.S. 132 212 U.S. 133–212 U.S. 138. Original Sources, accessed November 22, 2024, http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=132A5CU99L9BGZ7.
MLA: U.S. Supreme Court. "Syllabus." Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Central Stock Yards Co., 212 U.S. 132 (1909), in 212 U.S. 132, pp. 212 U.S. 133–212 U.S. 138. Original Sources. 22 Nov. 2024. http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=132A5CU99L9BGZ7.
Harvard: U.S. Supreme Court, 'Syllabus' in Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Central Stock Yards Co., 212 U.S. 132 (1909). cited in 1909, 212 U.S. 132, pp.212 U.S. 133–212 U.S. 138. Original Sources, retrieved 22 November 2024, from http://originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=132A5CU99L9BGZ7.
|